GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs 210

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 210 and GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 210
2009
512 MB GDDR2, 30 Watt
0.31

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms 210 by a whopping 28687% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13295
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.51
Power efficiency0.6919.12
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT218AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1610240
Core clock speed589 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors260 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Watt320 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.160816.0
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm310 mm
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s736.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 210 0.31
RTX 4080 SUPER 89.24
+28687%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 210 121
RTX 4080 SUPER 34299
+28246%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1259
1440p0−1180
4K-0−1117

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.86
1440pno data5.55
4Kno data8.54

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 300
+0%
300
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 246
+0%
246
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 249
+0%
249
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 280
+0%
280
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 240
+0%
240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 246
+0%
246
+0%
Far Cry 5 240
+0%
240
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 344
+0%
344
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 308
+0%
308
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 217
+0%
217
+0%
Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 214
+0%
214
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 238
+0%
238
+0%
Far Cry 5 227
+0%
227
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 342
+0%
342
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 285
+0%
285
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 179
+0%
179
+0%
Metro Exodus 227
+0%
227
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 547
+0%
547
+0%
Valorant 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190
+0%
190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 199
+0%
199
+0%
Far Cry 5 212
+0%
212
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 322
+0%
322
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 263
+0%
263
+0%
Valorant 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 169
+0%
169
+0%
Metro Exodus 162
+0%
162
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 208
+0%
208
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 306
+0%
306
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 221
+0%
221
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 117
+0%
117
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 187
+0%
187
+0%
Metro Exodus 106
+0%
106
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+0%
204
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 305
+0%
305
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 89.24
Recency 12 October 2009 8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 320 Watt

GeForce 210 has 966.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 28687.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 210 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3747 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2530 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 210 or GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.