ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View vs GeForce 210

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1323not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.67no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT218RV620
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.49 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1640
Core clock speed589 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors260 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30.5 Watt32 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.1601.600
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm170 mm
Height2.731" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth8.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGADisplayPort2x VHDCI
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.13.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 32 Watt

GeForce 210 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 and FirePro 2450 Multi-View. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 is a desktop card while FirePro 2450 Multi-View is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
FirePro 2450 Multi-View

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3625 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro 2450 Multi-View on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.