Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce 210 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
210 210 OEM 210 PCI 210 Rev. 2 256 DDR 256 SDR 310 OEM 315 OEM 405 OEM 510 OEM 605 OEM
VS

Contents

210 Rev. 2 210 Rev. 2
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGT218Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164
Core clock speed520 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1950 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.160no data
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGAno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary

Recency 12 October 2009 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 210 Rev. 2 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
R5 240 OEM Radeon R5 240 OEM
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
R5 220 OEM Radeon R5 220 OEM
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile UHD Graphics 710 Mobile
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
GT 740M GeForce GT 740M
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
GT 555M GeForce GT 555M
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 73 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.