GeForce GT 320 OEM vs 2 Go (200 / 100)
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | NV11 | GT215 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 March 2001 (23 years ago) | 2 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 540 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 166 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 727 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 43 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 12.96 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 0.1875 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 175 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 32 / 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1580 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 25.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | no data | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2001 | 2 February 2010 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 43 Watt |
2 Go (200 / 100) has 2050% lower power consumption.
GT 320 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) and GeForce GT 320 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 2 Go (200 / 100) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 320 OEM is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
