Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs GRID M60-2Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking376not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.17no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGM204Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 August 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048896
Core clock speed557 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1178 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate150.8123.2
Floating-point processing power4.825 TFLOPS3.942 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs12856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID M60-2Q and Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID M60-2Q is a workstation graphics card while Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GRID M60-2Q
Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GRID M60-2Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.