Radeon Pro WX 8100 vs GRID M40

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking671not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.90no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2017 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed1033 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate33.06336.0
Floating-point processing power0.7933 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 May 2016 3 December 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 230 Watt

GRID M40 has 360% lower power consumption.

Pro WX 8100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID M40 and Radeon Pro WX 8100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M40
GRID M40
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 3 votes

Rate GRID M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.