RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GRID M3-3020

GRID M3-3020 GRID M6-8Q
VS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5880 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.66

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a whopping 841% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3-3020
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51917
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.77
Power efficiencyno data16.64
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107AD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64018176
Core clock speed1033 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate52.241,423
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs40568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.08.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−917%
183
+917%
1440p16−18
−888%
158
+888%
4K12−14
−842%
113
+842%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.15
1440pno data43.03
4Kno data60.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Hitman 3 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 260
+0%
260
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 219
+0%
219
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 917% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 888% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 842% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.66 72.09
Recency 18 May 2016 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 6000 Ada Generation has a 841.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 5000 Ada Generation RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
FirePro W5100 FirePro W5100
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
RX 580 2048SP Radeon RX 580 2048SP
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
Apple M3 Max 30-Core GPU M3 Max 30-Core GPU
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
RTX 3050 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GRID M3-3020 GRID M3 3020
vs
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
RX 550 640SP Radeon RX 550 640SP
vs
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
RX 550 640SP Radeon RX 550 640SP
vs
Vega 11 Embedded Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 77 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.