GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs GRID M3-3020

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M3-3020 with GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GRID M3-3020
2016
4 GB GDDR5
7.66

RTX 2080 Ti outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a whopping 635% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51944
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.48
Power efficiencyno data15.65
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM107TU102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 May 2016 (8 years ago)20 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404352
Core clock speed1033 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate52.24420.2
Floating-point processing power1.672 TFLOPS13.45 TFLOPS
ROPs1688
TMUs40272
Tensor Coresno data544
Ray Tracing Coresno data68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB11 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit352 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/s616.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA5.07.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−671%
162
+671%
1440p14−16
−736%
117
+736%
4K12−14
−683%
94
+683%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
+0%
125
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107
+0%
107
+0%
Battlefield 5 244
+0%
244
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 197
+0%
197
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 346
+0%
346
+0%
Hitman 3 161
+0%
161
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 285
+0%
285
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216
+0%
216
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 266
+0%
266
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 181
+0%
181
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+0%
91
+0%
Battlefield 5 224
+0%
224
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 152
+0%
152
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 321
+0%
321
+0%
Hitman 3 156
+0%
156
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 267
+0%
267
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 255
+0%
255
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 82
+0%
82
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80
+0%
80
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 103
+0%
103
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+0%
168
+0%
Hitman 3 139
+0%
139
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 202
+0%
202
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90
+0%
90
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 104
+0%
104
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 166
+0%
166
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+0%
112
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72
+0%
72
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67
+0%
67
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 313
+0%
313
+0%
Hitman 3 100
+0%
100
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 251
+0%
251
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105
+0%
105
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 66
+0%
66
+0%
Hitman 3 59
+0%
59
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130
+0%
130
+0%
Metro Exodus 111
+0%
111
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+0%
98
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+0%
50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46
+0%
46
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+0%
52
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 107
+0%
107
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73
+0%
73
+0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and RTX 2080 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Ti is 671% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 736% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2080 Ti is 683% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.66 56.33
Recency 18 May 2016 20 September 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 11 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

RTX 2080 Ti has a 635.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 175% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4138 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.