Matrox G550 vs GRID K280Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking506not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G500 (2001−2005)
GPU code nameGK104Condor
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,875 no data
Current priceno data$118

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.360.25
Floating-point performance2,289 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

We couldn't decide between GRID K280Q and Matrox G550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K280Q is a workstation graphics card while Matrox G550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K280Q
GRID K280Q
Matrox G550
G550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K280Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Matrox G550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.