Quadro FX 5500 SDI vs GRID K220Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking840not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.14no data
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK104G71
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 $6,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt104 Watt
Texture fill rate95.3615.60
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3216
TMUs12824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz505 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s32.32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 104 Watt

GRID K220Q has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5500 SDI, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 116.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 5500 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GRID K220Q
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 SDI
Quadro FX 5500 SDI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GRID K220Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 5500 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.