H100 SXM5 vs GRID K220Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking842not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK104GH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15368448
Core clock speed745 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1780 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate95.36939.8
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPS30.07 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs128528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s1,920 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.09.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 700 Watt

GRID K220Q has 211.1% lower power consumption.

H100 SXM5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K220Q and H100 SXM5. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GRID K220Q
NVIDIA H100 SXM5
H100 SXM5

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GRID K220Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 27 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.