Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs GRID K160Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking954not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.30no data
Power efficiency0.86no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK107Viola
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)7 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923840
Core clock speed850 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt232 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60564.0
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs16240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Lengthno data386 mm
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 June 2013 7 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 232 Watt

GRID K160Q has 78.5% lower power consumption.

Playstation 5 Pro GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID K160Q and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K160Q is a workstation graphics card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K160Q
GRID K160Q
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K160Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 59 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.