AeroBox GPU vs GRID K120Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.42no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Kryptos
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date2 July 2014 (10 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$125 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed850 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate13.6055.16
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/s68.22 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 July 2014 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 100 Watt

AeroBox GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID K120Q and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID K120Q is a workstation graphics card while AeroBox GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K120Q
GRID K120Q
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GRID K120Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.