Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GRID A100B

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGA100DG1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912768
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate434.279.20
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs19224
TMUs43248
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount48 GB4 GB
Memory bus width6144 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 25 Watt

GRID A100B has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 1500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100B and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100B is a workstation card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100B
GRID A100B
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GRID A100B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 254 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.