ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo vs GRID A100B

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA100Rage Pro Turbo
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912no data
Core clock speed900 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHzno data
Number of transistors54,200 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Wattno data
Texture fill rate434.20.08
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1921
TMUs4321
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 2x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSDR
Maximum RAM amount48 GB4 MB
Memory bus width6144 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/s600 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.0None
Vulkan1.2-
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 350 nm

GRID A100B has an age advantage of 23 years, a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100B and 3D Rage PRO Turbo. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100B is a workstation graphics card while 3D Rage PRO Turbo is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100B
GRID A100B
ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo
3D Rage PRO Turbo

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GRID A100B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.