Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs GRID A100A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGA100Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912384
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1005 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate434.243.20
Floating-point processing power13.89 TFLOPS1.382 TFLOPS
ROPs1928
TMUs43224
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount48 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width6144 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,866 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 28 Watt

GRID A100A has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 1328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GRID A100A and Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GRID A100A is a workstation card while Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID A100A
GRID A100A
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate GRID A100A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.