Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs GMA

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)Generation 12.0 (2020)
GPU code nameCloverviewTiger Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 May 2010 (14 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed533 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Manufacturing process technology32 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.06652.80
Floating-point performanceno data0.8448 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 May 2010 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA and Iris Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA is a desktop card while Iris Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA
GMA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
Iris Xe Graphics G4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 8 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 192 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.