GeForce RTX 3070 vs GMA

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1538	48
Place by popularity	not in top-100	38
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	57.42
Power efficiency	no data	17.91
Architecture	PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Cloverview	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 May 2010 (14 years ago)	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	5888
Core clock speed	533 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.066	317.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	96
TMUs	2	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	ES 2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	148
1440p	no data	99
4K	no data	63

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.37
1440p	no data	5.04
4K	no data	7.92

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	4 May 2010	1 September 2020
Chip lithography	32 nm	8 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---