GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1 vs GMA X4500MHD

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameCantigaGK208B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)27 March 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80192
Core clock speed533 MHz954 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,020 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate5.33015.26
Floating-point processing power0.08528 TFLOPS0.3663 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs1016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data146 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2008 27 March 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 19 Watt

GMA X4500MHD has 46.2% lower power consumption.

GT 710 PCIe x1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500MHD and GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4500MHD is a notebook card while GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500MHD
GMA X4500MHD
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1
GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate GMA X4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 33 votes

Rate GeForce GT 710 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.