A10G vs GMA X4500MHD

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated66
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.55
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCantigaGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2008 (16 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores809216
Core clock speed533 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate5.330492.5
Floating-point processing power0.08528 TFLOPS31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs10288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2008 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 150 Watt

GMA X4500MHD has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500MHD and A10G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4500MHD is a notebook card while A10G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500MHD
GMA X4500MHD
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 12 votes

Rate GMA X4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.