GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GMA X3000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated32
Place by popularitynot in top-10071
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.56
Power efficiencyno data14.59
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwaterGA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (18 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed500 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000339.8
Floating-point processing powerno data21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1188 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data608.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 290 Watt

GMA X3000 has 2130.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X3000 and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X3000
GMA X3000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 28 votes

Rate GMA X3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5900 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.