HD Graphics 6EU Mobile vs GMA 950

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 3.5 (2005)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameLakeportSandy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2005 (19 years ago)1 May 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data48
Core clock speed166 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data504 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate0.664.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs11
TMUs46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.03.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2005 1 May 2011
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 45 Watt

GMA 950 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics 6EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 950 and HD Graphics 6EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 950
GMA 950
Intel HD Graphics 6EU Mobile
HD Graphics 6EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 139 votes

Rate GMA 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate HD Graphics 6EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.