Radeon RX 580X Mobile vs GMA 3650

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCedarviewPolaris 20
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322304
Core clock speed640 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1077 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.560155.1
Floating-point processing power0.04096 TFLOPS4.963 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs4144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIMXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 11 April 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 100 Watt

GMA 3650 has 669.2% lower power consumption.

RX 580X Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3650 and Radeon RX 580X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3650 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 580X Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 3650
GMA 3650
AMD Radeon RX 580X Mobile
Radeon RX 580X Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 10 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.