Radeon RX 7700 XT vs GMA 3600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated40
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.88
Power efficiencyno data16.42
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCedarviewNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores323456
Core clock speed400 MHz1435 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2544 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600549.5
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs4216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 25 August 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 245 Watt

GMA 3600 has 1784.6% lower power consumption.

RX 7700 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3600 and Radeon RX 7700 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 3600
GMA 3600
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 23 votes

Rate GMA 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1404 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.