GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1535	51
Place by popularity	not in top-100	25
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	68.28
Power efficiency	no data	18.29
Architecture	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Pineview	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	1 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	4864
Core clock speed	400 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	123 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	253.1
Floating-point processing power	0.0128 TFLOPS	16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	80
TMUs	2	152
Tensor Cores	no data	152
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCI	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	142
1440p	no data	78
4K	no data	49

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.81
1440p	no data	5.12
4K	no data	8.14

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	9 May 2007	1 December 2020
Chip lithography	45 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	200 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---