UHD Graphics 750 vs GMA 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.57
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBearlakeRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60020.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

GMA 3100 has 15.4% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3100 and UHD Graphics 750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3100 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 3100
GMA 3100
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 281 vote

Rate GMA 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 390 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.