PG506-242 vs FireStream 9370

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking565not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCypressGA100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 June 2010 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16003584
Core clock speed825 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate66.00322.6
Floating-point performance2.64 gflops10.32 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit3072 Bit
Memory clock speed4600 MHz2.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s933.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.0N/A
OpenGL4.4N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2010 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 165 Watt

PG506-242 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9370 and PG506-242. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370
NVIDIA PG506-242
PG506-242

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate PG506-242 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.