GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs FireStream 9250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking774not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.38no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRV770AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002560
Core clock speed625 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1605 MHz
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00128.4
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS8.218 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4080
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s168.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVIPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 4050 Max-Q has an age advantage of 14 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9250 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 48 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.