Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs FirePro W8100
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 292 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
GPU code name | Hawaii | Ellesmere |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2014 (10 years ago) | 24 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2304 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Number of transistors | 6,200 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 179.0 |
Floating-point performance | 4.219 gflops | 5.728 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | 305 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Form factor | full height / full length | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
HDMI | - | + |
StereoOutput3D | + | - |
DisplayPort count | 4 | no data |
Dual-link DVI support | + | - |
HD сomponent video output | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 June 2014 | 24 April 2017 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
FirePro W8100 has 13.6% lower power consumption.
Pro Duo Polaris, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FirePro W8100 and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.