Radeon Sky 900 vs FirePro W8000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking435not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.22no data
Power efficiency3.30no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiTahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 June 2012 (12 years ago)27 March 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17923584 ×2
Core clock speed900 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate100.8106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3232 ×2
TMUs112112 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length279 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthfull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support++

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2012 27 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 300 Watt

FirePro W8000 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Sky 900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W8000 and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W8000
FirePro W8000
AMD Radeon Sky 900
Radeon Sky 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro W8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W8000 or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.