GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile vs FirePro W7100

#ad 
Buy
FirePro W2100 FirePro W4100 FirePro W4300 FirePro W5000 FirePro W5000 DVI FirePro W5100 FirePro W7000 FirePro W7100 FirePro W8000 FirePro W8100 FirePro W9000 FirePro W9100
VS
#ad 
Buy
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7100 with GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

FirePro W7100
2014
8 GB GDDR5, 400 Watt
12.96
+30.3%

W7100 outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking364427
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.8810.55
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTongaGP107B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 August 2014 (10 years ago)3 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792640
Core clock speed920 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1493 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rate103.059.72
Floating-point processing power3.297 TFLOPS1.911 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4000 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s112 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDCP-2.2
G-SYNC support-+
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream-+
GPU Boostno data3.0
Ansel-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p95−100
+30.1%
73
−30.1%
Full HD55−60
+19.6%
46
−19.6%
1440p30−35
+25%
24
−25%
4K18−20
+20%
15
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+0%
42
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+0%
39
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+0%
29
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+0%
26
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10
+0%
10
+0%

This is how FirePro W7100 and GTX 1050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W7100 is 30% faster in 900p
  • FirePro W7100 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W7100 is 25% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro W7100 is 20% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 38 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 12.96 9.95
Recency 12 August 2014 3 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4000 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro W7100 has a 30.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1050 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W7100 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD FirePro W7100
FirePro W7100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 130V Arc Graphics 130V
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
RX Vega 11 AMD RX Vega 11
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
Pro 560X AMD Pro 560X
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
TITAN RTX TITAN RTX
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
GTX 1060 6 GB GP104 NVIDIA GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
Pro 575X AMD Pro 575X
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
Pro 580X AMD Pro 580X
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
RX 640 AMD RX 640
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
Pro Vega II AMD Pro Vega II
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100
RX 5800 XT AMD RX 5800 XT
vs
FirePro W7100 W7100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 76 votes

Rate FirePro W7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1332 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7100 or GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.