GeForce RTX 5070 vs FirePro W600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking675not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.46no data
Power efficiency3.97no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGB205
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 June 2012 (12 years ago)2025
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5126400
Core clock speed750 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00504.0
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS32.26 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s120.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-9.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 220 Watt

FirePro W600 has 193.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W600 and GeForce RTX 5070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W600
FirePro W600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GeForce RTX 5070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 15 votes

Rate FirePro W600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 130 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.