GeForce GTX 260M vs FirePro W5170M

Place in the ranking	597	1106
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	1.04
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	Tropo	G92
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 August 2014 (10 years ago)	3 March 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	112
Core clock speed	900 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,500 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	37.00	30.80
Floating-point processing power	1.184 TFLOPS	0.308 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	no data	462
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	-	2-way
MXM Type	no data	MXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	Up to 950 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	61 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	DisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMI
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
Power management	no data	8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5170M 5.68
+480%

GTX 260M 0.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W5170M 2191
+478%

GTX 260M 379

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+200%

3−4

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Hitman 3	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +53.1%	30−35 −53.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Hitman 3	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +53.1%	30−35 −53.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +200%	5−6 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +200%	3−4 −200%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Hitman 3	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +169%	12−14 −169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20−22 +186%	7−8 −186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +53.1%	30−35 −53.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+1400%

1−2

−1400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +700%	2−3 −700%
Hitman 3	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Metro Exodus	4−5	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +800%	4−5 −800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+233%

3−4

−233%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
Metro Exodus	3−4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

This is how W5170M and GTX 260M compete in popular games:

A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the W5170M is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, W5170M surpassed GTX 260M in all 43 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.68	0.98
Recency	25 August 2014	3 March 2009
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	65 nm

W5170M has a 479.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W5170M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5170M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 260M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.