HD Graphics 620 vs FirePro W5130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W5130M with HD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

W5130M
2015
2 GB GDDR5
3.65
+50.8%

W5130M outperforms HD Graphics 620 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking710834
Place by popularitynot in top-10059
Power efficiencyno data11.52
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTropoKaby Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date2 October 2015 (9 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed900 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate29.6024.00
Floating-point processing power0.9472 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5130M 3.65
+50.8%
HD Graphics 620 2.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

W5130M 1409
+50.7%
HD Graphics 620 935

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

W5130M 3106
+106%
HD Graphics 620 1509

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

W5130M 2110
+126%
HD Graphics 620 934

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

W5130M 14381
+86.2%
HD Graphics 620 7725

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
+76.9%
13
−76.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−19%
25
+19%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+213%
15
−213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+10.8%
35−40
−10.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hitman 3 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how W5130M and HD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • W5130M is 77% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the W5130M is 500% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 620 is 19% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • W5130M is ahead in 52 tests (93%)
  • HD Graphics 620 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 2.42
Recency 2 October 2015 30 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

W5130M has a 50.8% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro W5130M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W5130M is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics 620 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5130M
FirePro W5130M
Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 69 votes

Rate FirePro W5130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 2616 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.