ATI Radeon X1050 vs FirePro W4300

Place in the ranking	530	1436
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.29	0.37
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code name	Bonaire	RV370
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2015 (9 years ago)	7 December 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	930 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	24 Watt
Texture fill rate	44.64	1.600
Floating-point processing power	1.428 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	4
TMUs	48	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	171 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	333 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	9.0
Shader Model	6.3	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W4300 7.51
+5677%

ATI X1050 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W4300 2894
+5806%

ATI X1050 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.51	0.13
Recency	1 December 2015	7 December 2006
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	24 Watt

FirePro W4300 has a 5676.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1050, on the other hand, has 108.3% lower power consumption.

The FirePro W4300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1050 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1050 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.