Quadro P2200 vs FirePro V5900

Place in the ranking	737	228
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.03	22.32
Architecture	TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Cayman	GP106
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011 (13 years ago)	10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1280
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1493 MHz
Number of transistors	2,640 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	19.20	119.4
Floating-point processing power	0.6144 TFLOPS	3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40
TMUs	32	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	230 mm	201 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	200.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI

4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V5900 3.28

Quadro P2200 24.17
+637%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V5900 1264

Quadro P2200 9327
+638%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.28	24.17
Recency	24 May 2011	10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm

Quadro P2200 has a 636.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.