Radeon HD 8470D vs ATI FirePro V3750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.04
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameRV730Scrapper
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 September 2008 (16 years ago)29 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed550 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data850 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6010.20
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs3212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed700 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 29 July 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 65 Watt

ATI V3750 has 35.4% lower power consumption.

HD 8470D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 71.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and Radeon HD 8470D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8470D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Radeon HD 8470D

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 121 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.