NVS 4200M vs ATI FirePro V3750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.09
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameRV730GF119
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date11 September 2008 (16 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32048
Core clock speed550 MHz810 MHz
Number of transistors514 million292 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate17.606.480
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.1555 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 25 Watt

NVS 4200M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 92% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and NVS 4200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro V3750 is a workstation card while NVS 4200M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
NVIDIA NVS 4200M
NVS 4200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 156 votes

Rate NVS 4200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3750 or NVS 4200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.