GRID K340 vs ATI FirePro V3750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.04
Power efficiencyno data0.96
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV730GK107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 September 2008 (16 years ago)23 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $3,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed550 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors514 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate17.6030.40
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.7296 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2008 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 225 Watt

ATI V3750 has 368.8% lower power consumption.

GRID K340, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro V3750 and GRID K340. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro V3750
FirePro V3750
NVIDIA GRID K340
GRID K340

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 9 votes

Rate FirePro V3750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID K340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.