Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs FirePro S9300 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.35
Power efficiencyno data10.63
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCapsaicinVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date31 March 2016 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584
Core clock speed850 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate217.6336.0
Floating-point processing power6.963 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMHBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 March 2016 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 230 Watt

Pro WX 8200 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9300 X2 and Radeon Pro WX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9300 X2
FirePro S9300 X2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9300 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.