Quadro M6000 24 GB vs FirePro S9150

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated179
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.84
Power efficiencyno data8.45
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameHawaiiGM200
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 August 2014 (10 years ago)5 March 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28163072
Core clock speed900 MHz988 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1114 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate158.4285.2
Floating-point processing power5.069 TFLOPS6.844 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs176256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB24 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s317.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2014 5 March 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 250 Watt

FirePro S9150 has 6.4% lower power consumption.

M6000 24 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S9150 and Quadro M6000 24 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S9150
FirePro S9150
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 12 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 16 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.