Tesla K80m vs FirePro S10000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.66no data
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameTahitiGK210
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096 ×22x 2496
Core clock speed825 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz824 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate106.4 ×22x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power3.405 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs32 ×22x 48
TMUs112 ×22x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length305 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB ×22x 12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit ×22x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth480 GB/s ×22x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 17 November 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 300 Watt

Tesla K80m has an age advantage of 2 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro S10000 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro S10000
FirePro S10000
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 40 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro S10000 or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.