Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs FirePro RG220A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameRV711DG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 May 2010 (14 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80768
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors242 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00079.20
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro RG220A and Iris Xe Graphics MAX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro RG220A is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro RG220A
FirePro RG220A
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro RG220A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 208 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.