Radeon PRO W7800 vs ATI FirePro M5725

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated14
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.53
Power efficiencyno data19.71
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameM96Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date9 January 2009 (15 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204480
Core clock speed675 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2499 MHz
Number of transistors514 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60699.7
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs32280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2009 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 260 Watt

ATI M5725 has 642.9% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M5725 and Radeon PRO W7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M5725 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI FirePro M5725
FirePro M5725
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro M5725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 31 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.