Radeon HD 8690M vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M4000 with Radeon HD 8690M, including specs and performance data.

FirePro M4000
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 33 Watt
4.13
+62%

M4000 outperforms HD 8690M by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689825
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.58no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameChelseaSun
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 June 2012 (12 years ago)1 March 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512320
Core clock speed675 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speedno data825 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.6016.50
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.528 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M4000 4.13
+62%
HD 8690M 2.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M4000 1593
+61.9%
HD 8690M 984

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M4000 1981
+23.8%
HD 8690M 1600

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro M4000 1713
+41.6%
HD 8690M 1210

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro M4000 12587
+58.7%
HD 8690M 7930

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+56.3%
16
−56.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+40%
20−22
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+16.2%
35−40
−16.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how FirePro M4000 and HD 8690M compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M4000 is 56% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the FirePro M4000 is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, FirePro M4000 surpassed HD 8690M in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.13 2.55
Recency 27 June 2012 1 March 2013

FirePro M4000 has a 62% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8690M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The FirePro M4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8690M in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 8690M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Radeon HD 8690M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 97 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.