RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking683not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.91no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameChelseaAD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2012 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed675 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60360.0
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2012 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 100 Watt

FirePro M4000 has 203% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M4000 and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M4000 is a mobile workstation card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.