Quadro P3200 vs FirePro M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M4000 and Quadro P3200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro M4000
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 33 Watt
4.13

P3200 outperforms M4000 by a whopping 451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.5820.79
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameChelseaGP104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2012 (12 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speed675 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60172.8
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorMXM-Ano data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro M4000 4.13
Quadro P3200 22.74
+451%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro M4000 1593
Quadro P3200 8762
+450%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

FirePro M4000 1981
Quadro P3200 16619
+739%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FirePro M4000 8628
Quadro P3200 45999
+433%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

FirePro M4000 1713
Quadro P3200 12555
+633%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

FirePro M4000 12587
Quadro P3200 82507
+555%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro M4000 5532
Quadro P3200 34195
+518%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−244%
86
+244%
4K5−6
−460%
28
+460%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−442%
65
+442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−448%
130−140
+448%
Hitman 3 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−282%
100−110
+282%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−706%
129
+706%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−130%
95−100
+130%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−633%
88
+633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−650%
75−80
+650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−448%
130−140
+448%
Hitman 3 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−282%
100−110
+282%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−888%
75−80
+888%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−381%
75−80
+381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−213%
50−55
+213%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−130%
95−100
+130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−233%
40
+233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−188%
72
+188%
Hitman 3 9−10
−411%
45−50
+411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−282%
100−110
+282%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−381%
75−80
+381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−188%
46
+188%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−130%
95−100
+130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−450%
40−45
+450%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Hitman 3 9−10
−200%
27−30
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−370%
45−50
+370%
Metro Exodus 0−1 40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−408%
130−140
+408%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−375%
35−40
+375%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Hitman 3 0−1 18−20
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2400%
24−27
+2400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Far Cry 5 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how FirePro M4000 and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 244% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 460% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 11700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 65 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.13 22.74
Recency 27 June 2012 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M4000 has 127.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro P3200, on the other hand, has a 450.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M4000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate FirePro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 296 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.