ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs FirePro M2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1082not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.32no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)no data
GPU code nameTurksMach32
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 1993 (31 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480no data
Core clock speed500 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16VLB
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorchip-downno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5VRAM
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s80.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
StereoOutput3D+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)None
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4None
OpenCL1.2None
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2012 1 January 1993
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 800 nm

FirePro M2000 has an age advantage of 19 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro M2000 and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro M2000
FirePro M2000
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.