Quadro FX 350 vs FirePro D700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.56no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiG72
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed850 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million112 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate108.82.200
Floating-point processing power3.482 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1284

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length279 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1370 MHz405 MHz
Memory bandwidth263.0 GB/s6.48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 January 2014 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 274 Watt 21 Watt

FirePro D700 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 350, on the other hand, has 1204.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro D700 and Quadro FX 350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D700
FirePro D700
NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 37 votes

Rate FirePro D700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.