RTX A2000 vs FirePro D500

Place in the ranking	428	142
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	87.80
Power efficiency	2.71	34.95
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Tahiti	GA106
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 January 2014 (11 years ago)	10 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	3328
Core clock speed	725 MHz	562 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	4,313 million	12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	69.60	124.8
Floating-point processing power	2.227 TFLOPS	7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48
TMUs	96	104
Tensor Cores	no data	104
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	279 mm	167 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	243.8 GB/s	288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	27−30 −248%	94 +248%
1440p	12−14 −275%	45 +275%
4K	8−9 −263%	29 +263%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	4.78
1440p	no data	9.98
4K	no data	15.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	84 +0%	84 +0%
Elden Ring	86 +0%	86 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	62 +0%	62 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	166 +0%	166 +0%
Metro Exodus	106 +0%	106 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	52 +0%	52 +0%
Dota 2	129 +0%	129 +0%
Elden Ring	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Far Cry 5	136 +0%	136 +0%
Fortnite	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	130 +0%	130 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	129 +0%	129 +0%
Metro Exodus	71 +0%	71 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45 +0%	45 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +0%	109 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Valorant	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	58 +0%	58 +0%
Elden Ring	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	58 +0%	58 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
World of Tanks	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	26 +0%	26 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +0%	79 +0%
Metro Exodus	62 +0%	62 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +0%	47 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Dota 2	56 +0%	56 +0%
Elden Ring	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	56 +0%	56 +0%
Metro Exodus	20 +0%	20 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +0%	56 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Fortnite	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	45 +0%	45 +0%
Valorant	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

This is how FirePro D500 and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

RTX A2000 is 248% faster in 1080p
RTX A2000 is 275% faster in 1440p
RTX A2000 is 263% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.78	35.54
Recency	18 January 2014	10 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	274 Watt	70 Watt

RTX A2000 has a 229.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 291.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro D500 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.